2961 products were found matching your search for Judicial Decision Making in 4 shops:

In the mid-1970s, as a social psychologist dedicated to the application of knowl­ edge, I welcomed our field's emerging interest in the legal system. I have al­ ways been fascinated by jury trials-something about the idea that two con­ ceptions of the truth were in irrevocable conflict and jurors could choose only one of them. More important, the criminal justice system is a major social force that has been ignored by social psychologists for most of the twentieth century. As I systematically began to explore the applications of social psycho­ logical concepts to the law 20 years ago, I experienced the delight of discovery similar to that of a child under a Christmas tree. It has been satisfying to be among the cohort of researchers who have studied the legal system, especially trial juries, from a psychological perspective. I believe we have learned much that would be useful if the system were to be revised. Hlf the system were to be revised" . . . there's the rub. As I have stated, my original motivation was the application of knowledge. Like other social scien­ tists, I believed-perhaps arrogantly-that the results of our research efforts could be used to make trial juries operate with more efficiency, accuracy, and satisfaction. Qver the last two decades, much knowledge has accumulated. How can we put this knowledge to work? Judges are the gatekeepers of the legal system.

In the mid-1970s, as a social psychologist dedicated to the application of knowl­ edge, I welcomed our field's emerging interest in the legal system. I have al­ ways been fascinated by jury trials-something about the idea that two con­ ceptions of the truth were in irrevocable conflict and jurors could choose only one of them. More important, the criminal justice system is a major social force that has been ignored by social psychologists for most of the twentieth century. As I systematically began to explore the applications of social psycho­ logical concepts to the law 20 years ago, I experienced the delight of discovery similar to that of a child under a Christmas tree. It has been satisfying to be among the cohort of researchers who have studied the legal system, especially trial juries, from a psychological perspective. I believe we have learned much that would be useful if the system were to be revised. Hlf the system were to be revised" . . . there's the rub. As I have stated, my original motivation was the application of knowledge. Like other social scien­ tists, I believed-perhaps arrogantly-that the results of our research efforts could be used to make trial juries operate with more efficiency, accuracy, and satisfaction. Qver the last two decades, much knowledge has accumulated. How can we put this knowledge to work? Judges are the gatekeepers of the legal system.

Book is in Used-Good condition. Pages and cover are clean and intact. Used items may not include supplementary materials such as CDs or access codes. May show signs of minor shelf wear and contain limited notes and highlighting. 3.32

Brand New! Usually ships within one business day! This item is: Judicial Decision-Making: A Coursebook, Barry Friedman, Margaret H. Le; 1st ed., 2020; '; ISBN: 9781642422573. For fastest delivery, choose Expedited Shipping. We represent the Internet's largest independent legal bookstore!

This is a general book on jurisprudence designed for both the novice and more experienced student, which makes it suitable for first-year law students. It is the first book to distinguish and connect traditional theories of judicial decision-making (e.g., legal formalism, textualism, legal realism, and legal process) with “critical process” (which is critical theory transformed from a theory of legal criticism into a theory of judicial decision-making). Brooks breaks new ground on several other fronts as well — he employs an innovative framework that divides judicial decision-making models into the “logical method” and the “policy method;” offers a more nuanced conceptualization of judicial policy-formulation in which judges are seen as not only making policy, but also (and more typically) as discovering and vindicating policy; redefines “ policy-making” in a manner that is different from our traditional understanding of the term; and synthesizes critical process into three judicial models: symmetrical, asymmetrical, and hybrid. The book is written in two parts. Part 1 (Traditional Process) discusses five major traditional judicial models, each reflective of either the logical method or the policy method. Part 1 ends with a synthesis of the traditional models (dividing them into three categories), which judges who have used the book find to be most useful. Part 2 (Critical Process) begins with a discussion of critical theory’s central theme and operating elements and then transforms these features into a theory of outsider-oriented judicial decision making, something judges can actually use in deciding cases. Critical theory is thus transformed into “critical process.”

Embedded Courts is laden with tension. Chinese courts are organized as a singular and unified system yet grassroots courts in urban and rural regions differ greatly in the way they use the law and are as diverse as the populations they serve. Based on extensive fieldwork and in-depth interviews, this book offers a penetrating discussion of the operation of Chinese courts. It explains how Chinese judges rule and how the law is not the only script they follow - political, administrative, social and economic factors all influence verdicts. This landmark work will revise our understanding of the role of law in China - one that cannot be easily understood through the standard lens of judicial independence and separation of powers. Ng and He make clear the struggle facing frontline judges as they bridge the gap between a rule-based application of law and an instrumentalist view that prioritizes stability maintenance.

Book is in Used-VeryGood condition. Pages and cover are clean and intact. Used items may not include supplementary materials such as CDs or access codes. May show signs of minor shelf wear and contain very limited notes and highlighting. 1.34

The U.S. Supreme Court is a public policy battleground in which organized interests attempt to etch their economic, legal, and political preferences into law through the filing of amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs. In Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making, Paul M. Collins, Jr. explores how organized interests influence the justices' decision making, including how the justices vote and whether they choose to author concurrences and dissents. Collins presents theories of judicial choice derived from disciplines as diverse as law, marketing, political science, and social psychology. This theoretically rich and empirically rigorous treatment of decision-making on the nation's highest court, which represents the most comprehensive examination ever undertaken of the influence of U.S. Supreme Court amicus briefs, provides clear evidence that interest groups play a significant role in shaping the justices' choices.

The U.S. Supreme Court is a public policy battleground in which organized interests attempt to etch their economic, legal, and political preferences into law through the filing of amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs. In Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making, Paul M. Collins, Jr. explores how organized interests influence the justices' decision making, including how the justices vote and whether they choose to author concurrences and dissents. Collins presents theories of judicial choice derived from disciplines as diverse as law, marketing, political science, and social psychology. This theoretically rich and empirically rigorous treatment of decision-making on the nation's highest court, which represents the most comprehensive examination ever undertaken of the influence of U.S. Supreme Court amicus briefs, provides clear evidence that interest groups play a significant role in shaping the justices' choices.

Help children build lifelong social-emotional strategies for responsible decision-making! Empower children to make responsible decisions with this fun and engaging 12-sided (dodecahedron) activity die that offers up kid-friendly, age-appropriate choices. This easy to grasp 6.75 diameter die is made of dense EVA foam thats super safe and is illustrated with simple drawings and easy to understand choices. This sensory, hands-on, SEL teaching tool provides practice of strategies that build lifelong interpersonal skills, independence, self-confidence, and adaptability. Some of the choices on this die include Read about a dinosaur or a unicorn, Put on a puppet show or watch the show, Wear short sleeves or a coat, and Swings, Slide, or Sandbox? Use this die in a lesson to model the many ways that these decisions could be made when they arise. An adult may also model the thinking and additional information that may be needed when faced with these choices. This tool is a great addition for any classroom or home, especially those with young children who may need a little assistance in learning how to make good choices and responsible decisions. WHAT YOU GET: 1 twelve-sided dense foam die with 6.75 diameter weighing in at 0.77 lbs.; GREAT SIZE FOR LITTLE HANDS: With a 6.75 diameter and weighing less than a pound, this die is easy to grasp and roll even for those with little hands and still developing motor skills!; KID-FRIENDLY STRATEGIES: Illustrations and simple text give kids easy practice of independent decision-making skills. Try one of twelve different decisions that kids - or anyone can make! ; SENSORY LEARNING EXPERIENCE: Kids can engage in a sensory, hands-on tactile approach to SEL. Great for helping children get ready to learn! ; MULTIPLE WAYS TO ENGAGE: Use this die in a lesson to model the many ways these choices can be made through planning and thinking.; TAKE IT FURTHER: Encourage your kids to think of their own choice scenarios. Feel free to explore w

Help children and students build lifelong social-emotional strategies with this set of three dice. Each die has 12 sides, and on each side is a simple suggestion for children to follow when the topic arises. Teach your students helpful ways to deal with their emotions and create coping skills by utilizing these dice for real world examples or create an interesting group activity where students will feel engaged and involved. Whether youre using these dice as problem-solving tools or for teaching lessons, they make great additions to any classroom. WHAT YOU GET: 3 twelve-sided dense foam die with 6.75 diameter weighing in at 0.77 lbs each.; GREAT SIZE FOR LITTLE HANDS: With a 6.75 diameter and weighing less than a pound, these dice are easy to grasp and roll even for those with little hands and still developing motor skills!; KID-FRIENDLY STRATEGIES: Illustrations and simple text give kids prompts for sharing and learning about themselves independently.; SENSORY LEARNING EXPERIENCE: Kids can engage in a sensory, hands-on tactile approach to SEL. Great for helping children deal with big feelings and get ready to learn! ; MULTIPLE WAYS TO ENGAGE: Use these dice in a lesson to model the many different strengths and interests' people have. For older children, you can even use the dice for self-awareness speaking or writing prompts.; TAKE IT FURTHER: Encourage your kids to think of their own things that make them special! Or have them interview a friend and share what makes that person special for an extra confidence boost!; EMOMISS EMOCONF EMODEC EMODICE2 social-emotional learning SEL emotions interactive SEL 172741 EMOMISS EMOCONF EMODEC EMODICE2 social-emotional learning SEL emotions interactive SEL 172741

Jewellery set: Necklace, earrings, and bracelet.  Tiger's Eye Semi-precious gemstone of protection and confidence. Its golden hues stimulate personal power, courage, and motivation, promote clarity. Tiger’s eye is said to be connected to the heavens and higher powers. Self-improvement Empowerment Creative expression Courage Strength Perseverance. Significance Chakra: Solar Pexus Birthstone: November & June Element: Earth & Fire To maximize the life of your Lila Rasa Jewellery, we suggest following the below care instructions: Preserve your plated jewellery by avoiding contact with cleaning agents, beauty products, water, and chemicals. Remove plated jewellery prior to exercise, washing your hands, or swimming. Our jewellery is hand-finished and plated with 22 carat gold on recycled brass. All Earring posts are made of sterling silver. Protect your plated jewellery by storing your items in a dry area in an air-tight plastic bag. Try to keep items apart, so they don’t tangle or get damaged. Natural gemstones can be fragile. To keep gemstones clean and shiny, lightly scrub with a soft-bristled brush, warm water, and detergent-free soap. Avoid chemicals or excessive temperatures when cleaning. Store in a safe, dry place when not worn to protect them from the elements of daily exposure.

Good Judgment, based upon the author's experience as a lawyer, law professor, and judge, explores the role of the judge and the art of judging. Engaging with the American, English, and Commonwealth literature on the role of the judge in the common law tradition, Good Judgment addresses the following questions: What exactly do judges do? What is properly within their role and what falls outside? How do judges approach their decision-making task? In an attempt to explain and reconcile two fundamental features of judging, namely judicial choice and judicial discipline, this book explores the nature and extent of judicial choice in the common law legal tradition and the structural features of that tradition that control and constrain that element of choice. As Sharpe explains, the law does not always provide clear answers, and judges are often left with difficult choices to make, but the power of judicial choice is disciplined and constrained and judges are not free to decide cases according to their own personal sense of justice.Although Good Judgment is accessibly written to appeal to the non-specialist reader with an interest in the judicial process, it also tackles fundamental issues about the nature of law and the role of the judge and will be of particular interest to lawyers, judges, law students, and legal academics.

Good Judgment, based upon the author's experience as a lawyer, law professor, and judge, explores the role of the judge and the art of judging. Engaging with the American, English, and Commonwealth literature on the role of the judge in the common law tradition, Good Judgment addresses the following questions: What exactly do judges do? What is properly within their role and what falls outside? How do judges approach their decision-making task? In an attempt to explain and reconcile two fundamental features of judging, namely judicial choice and judicial discipline, this book explores the nature and extent of judicial choice in the common law legal tradition and the structural features of that tradition that control and constrain that element of choice. As Sharpe explains, the law does not always provide clear answers, and judges are often left with difficult choices to make, but the power of judicial choice is disciplined and constrained and judges are not free to decide cases according to their own personal sense of justice.Although Good Judgment is accessibly written to appeal to the non-specialist reader with an interest in the judicial process, it also tackles fundamental issues about the nature of law and the role of the judge and will be of particular interest to lawyers, judges, law students, and legal academics.

Can the Constitution change with the times without forsaking the framers’ original intent? This carefully considered book is a welcome addition to the debate over “judicial activism.” Constitutional scholar Kermit Roosevelt III offers an elegantly simple way to resolve the heated discord between conservatives, who argue that the Constitution is immutable, and progressives, who insist that it is a living document that must be reinterpreted in new cultural contexts so that its meaning evolves. Roosevelt uses plain language and compelling examples to explain how the Constitution can be both a constant and an organic document. Recent years have witnessed an increasing drumbeat of complaints about judicial behavior, focusing particularly on Supreme Court decisions that critics charge are reflections of the Justices’ political preferences rather than enforcement of the Constitution. The author takes a balanced look at these controversial decisions through a compelling new lens of constitutional interpretation. He clarifies the task of the Supreme Court in constitutional cases, then sets out a model to describe how the Court creates doctrine to implement the meaning of the Constitution. Finally, Roosevelt uses this model to show which decisions can be justified as legitimate and which cannot.

As its name suggests, a quasi-judicial decision is like a court decision in several important ways. It requires the deciding board to use its judgment in applying general law to a particular land use situation while ensuring the constitutional due process rights of the parties. This handbook is designed as a guide for boards making development regulation decisions through the quasi-judicial process. The discussion covers the process prior to, during, and after the evidentiary hearing as well as the decision itself. Other topics include the board of adjustment, variances, special use permits, certificates of appropriateness, appeals of zoning determinations, and judicial review.A package of 5 books is available for a discounted price for those looking to purchase copies for their entire board.

Has a sturdy binding with some shelf wear. May have some markings or highlighting. Used copies may not include access codes or Cd's. Slight bending may be present.

Unread book in perfect condition.

Unread book in perfect condition.

This is a general book on jurisprudence designed for both the novice and more experienced student, which makes it suitable for first-year law students. It is the first book to distinguish and connect traditional theories of judicial decision-making (e.g., legal formalism, textualism, legal realism, and legal process) with “critical process” (which is critical theory transformed from a theory of legal criticism into a theory of judicial decision-making). Brooks breaks new ground on several other fronts as well — he employs an innovative framework that divides judicial decision-making models into the “logical method” and the “policy method;” offers a more nuanced conceptualization of judicial policy-formulation in which judges are seen as not only making policy, but also (and more typically) as discovering and vindicating policy; redefines “ policy-making” in a manner that is different from our traditional understanding of the term; and synthesizes critical process into three judicial models: symmetrical, asymmetrical, and hybrid. The book is written in two parts. Part 1 (Traditional Process) discusses five major traditional judicial models, each reflective of either the logical method or the policy method. Part 1 ends with a synthesis of the traditional models (dividing them into three categories), which judges who have used the book find to be most useful. Part 2 (Critical Process) begins with a discussion of critical theory’s central theme and operating elements and then transforms these features into a theory of outsider-oriented judicial decision making, something judges can actually use in deciding cases. Critical theory is thus transformed into “critical process.”